SC orders status quo, stays SC/ST quota in promotion for government jobs

| April 16, 2019

HIGHLIGHTS

  • The Supreme Court stayed on Monday reservation in promotion for Scheduled Castes and Tribes (SC/STs) in government jobs
  • A bench of Justices S A Bobde and Abdul Nazeer directed that status quo be maintained till the issue is decided by it
  • The court said a study is needed on the impact of such promotions on administrative efficiency

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court stayed on Monday reservation in promotion for Scheduled Castes and Tribes (SC/STs) in government jobs after the Centre and states failed to implement the scheme for want of quantifiable data on the adequacy of their representation.
Hearing a batch of 84 petitions filed by the Centre, states and other individuals, a bench of Justices S A Bobde and Abdul Nazeer directed that status quo be maintained till the issue is decided by it.








A five-judge Constitution bench of the court had, in September last year, said reservation in promotion could be implemented but ruled that the “creamy layer exclusion” principle, which applied only to other backward classes, could be extended to SCs and STs to deny quota benefits to the “elite” among the two socially underprivileged communities.
The apex court had exempted states from collecting quantifiable data on backwardness to justify reservation in promotion by modifying its earlier order in the Nagraj case but held that its 2016 verdict was correct in stipulating the condition on the need for quantifiable data on adequacy of representation. The court said a study is needed on the impact of such promotions on administrative efficiency before granting reservation. The Constitution bench had decided on the broader issue on reservation in promotion and left it for a regular bench to decide petitions filed by individuals and states on the issue.




“According to us, Nagraj has wisely left the test for determining adequacy of representation in promotional posts to the states for the simple reason that as the posts get higher, it may be necessary, even if a proportionality test to the population as a whole is taken into account, to reduce the number of SCs and STs in the promotional posts as one goes upwards,” the court had said.
Subsequent to the SC’s verdict in the Jarnail Singh case, the Delhi high court in November directed the Centre to implement the apex court order and grant reservation in promotion in central jobs within three months as the policy had not been implemented for years due to pendency of the case. “There is no gainsaying that in view of the latest decision of SC in Jarnail Singh, the Union of India and all others are bound to comply with the same,” the court had said.




Challenging the decision of the HC, the Centre rushed to the Supreme Court and attorney general K K Venugopal told the bench that it was not possible to implement the order within three months. “The government has to undertake the exercise in its all departments to find out adequacy of representation of SC/ST employees,” he said and pleaded the court to stay the order of the HC.
Senior advocate Rajeev Dhavan and advocate Kumar Parimal, appearing for government employees from the general category, told the bench that the SC verdict was very clear and reservation in promotion could not be implemented without fulfilling the conditions laid down in Jarnail Singh and Nagraj cases.
TOP COMMENT
It is gambit engineering of political class to use ‘Quota’ as potent tool to influence the conviction of particular voting constituency, which has developed result oriented in election by… Read More

Lawyers appearing for the state governments contended that the SC should adjudicate the issue to put to rest the controversy as thousands of posts were lying vacant due to non-implementation of the policy and pleaded the bench to decide the issue at the earliest.
The court, which had earlier directed Maharashtra, Tripura and other states to maintain status quo, said it was not possible to give an early hearing and posted it for October 15 for final hearing.

सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने दिल्ली हाई कोर्ट के एक आदेश पर सोमवार को यथास्थिति बनाए रखने का आदेश दिया। इसमें केंद्र से अनुसूचित जाति और अनुसूचित जनजातियों (एससी-एसटी) के कर्मचारियों को सरकारी नौकरियों में पदोन्नति में आरक्षण देने पर शीर्ष अदालत के फैसले का तीन महीने के अंदर पालन करने को कहा गया था।

हाई कोर्ट ने पिछले साल 12 नवंबर के आदेश में कहा था कि अधिकारी शीर्ष अदालत की पांच जजों की संविधान पीठ के फैसले का पालन करने के लिए बाध्य हैं। पीठ ने एससी-एसटी समुदाय के लोगों को सरकारी नौकरियों में पदोन्नति में आरक्षण देने का रास्ता साफ किया था। हाई कोर्ट ने पिछले साल 26 सितंबर के संविधान पीठ के फैसले का संज्ञान लेते हुए केंद्र को तीन महीने में इस आदेश का पालन करने को कहा था।

केंद्र सरकार ने हाई कोर्ट के आदेश को चुनौती दी थी, जिस पर सोमवार को जस्टिस एसए बोबडे और जस्टिस एसए नजीर की पीठ के समक्ष सुनवाई हुई। पीठ ने कहा, ‘इस मुद्दे पर विस्तार से सुनवाई जरूरी है। हम आज इस पर यथास्थिति बनाए रखना उचित समझते हैं।’इससे पहले अटार्नी जनरल केके वेणुगोपाल ने कहा कि हाई कोर्ट को इस तरह के आदेश पारित नहीं करने चाहिए। वेणुगोपाल ने कहा कि एससी और एसटी समुदायों को सरकारी नौकरियों में पदोन्नति में आरक्षण से संबंधित विभिन्न मुद्दों पर शीर्ष अदालत फैसला करेगी, लेकिन हाई कोर्ट का निर्देश केंद्र के लिए समस्या है। पीठ ने कहा कि वह इस मुद्दे से संबंधित कुछ अन्य याचिकाओं पर भी ग्रीष्मकालीन अवकाश के बाद सुनवाई करेगी, जो पहले ही उसके समक्ष लंबित हैं।

सुनवाई के दौरान महाराष्ट्र के वकील ने कहा कि हजारों पद खाली पड़े हैं। ऐसे खाली पदों की संख्या राज्य में 89 हजार है। उन्होंने कहा, ‘इन पदों को भरने के लिए कोई व्यवस्था होनी चाहिए।’

Category: Indian Railways, News

About the Author ()

Comments are closed.